Showing posts with label C. S. Lewis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label C. S. Lewis. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

God, Help Me

In pre-Christ history, faith is counted as righteousness. In post-Christ times, we believe salvation is through faith alone. Faith, and expressions of that faith, have always been and will always be important.

When I hear the expression, “God help me,” I do not usually think of faith--maybe of frustration or fear, but not faith. In fact, the God in this particular cry is less of an address for the next words and more of an expression of emphasis. Generally, people who say “God help me” do not want help from God; they do not want help from anyone. They want relief, which is something entirely different.

C.S. Lewis explores the power of “God help me” in my favorite work of his, The Great Divorce. For those of you who have read it, I am speaking of the character with the spiritually parasitic lizard who, with a great deal of persuasion, permits an angel to kill the lizard. Those of you who have not read it may find that situation rather odd, and you are not wrong to feel that way, but I strongly recommend reading the book anyway.

Back to the story: The character fears pain, and even death, but realizes it would be better to die than to go on living with the unwanted attachment. So, he allows the lizard to be killed. Interestingly, the lizard does not actually die, but is instead transformed into a beautiful, powerful horse. The ghost, now transformed into a clean, radiant Solid Person, sits atop the horse and takes off towards the mountains (which in this story symbolize heaven). So the ghost quickly learns he has nothing to fear, but in the moments leading up to his transformation, he has no idea what is coming. As the transformation begins, he quietly whimpers, “God help me.” He does not want relief, for there is nothing yet from which he would need relief. So what does he want? Perhaps he asked for it directly; ask and you shall receive.

This character’s story is the redemption arc of the whole work, which is interesting, for of all the characters in the story, this one seems the least redeemable. I do not think it is a coincidence that while all the other characters from the Grey Town are rather clear in appearance, this character possesses a certain darkness. He seems less like a see-through person and more like a ghost. When I first read this work (a long time ago), my inclination towards this ghost-like character was pity. He seemed the least likely candidate to make the journey to the mountains. And yet, even the narrator, who seemed to have the best chance of all at making the journey, never actually set out for the mountains. That is not to say that he would not have if the story had continued. But as it stands, the only character who actually moved away from the bus from the Grey Town and toward the mountains was the very character who seemed least likely to do so.

I wonder if this has anything to do with his utterance of “God help me.” It seems every other see-through character either demands the help of his or her respective Solid Person, or else desperately tries to help his or her self. The Solid People are always reminding their respective see-through people to seek help from the only true source of help, and the only true source of any and all other things. This ghost, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to look anywhere else for help. When he finally comes to terms with the fact that he needs help, he immediately invokes the help of God. In turn, his sin is destroyed and made into something new and useful, and he himself is made into something beautiful.

This is not the posture with which I feel naturally compelled to approach anything in life. We live in a world that encourages self-confidence and self-love. This ghost was only able to be made new when he began to practice self-denial. So, even though this ghost is not the ghost with which I most identified, he is the ghost who made me feel most convicted. I should not fight the feelings of inadequacy and awareness of my own shortcomings which I often see as plagues in my life. If I really want to choose the mountains, I have to approach with the heart, mind, and soul in a posture resembling the whimper of “God help me.”

I found in this work that there were many characters who I silently (and in some cases, noisily) rooted for. Many of the characters seemed to be on the verge of persuasion to head to the mountains. Some even came to the high country looking for the mountains. But their reasons were wrong. They wanted to come to the mountains to see lost loved ones, or to feel important, or to fulfill desires of various other kinds. This ghost with the lizard, on the other hand, did not seem intent on reaching the mountains. He didn’t seem to desire anything strongly at all. I wonder if this had anything to do with the fact that he was able to choose the mountains. The narrator’s Solid Person put it best when he said, “Brass is mistaken for gold more easily than clay is.” Was the ghost more likely to choose heaven because he was given clay instead of brass? Perhaps. Was this fair? Perhaps not. But then, everyone was still given an equal opportunity to choose. Wherein lies the balance between what we can and cannot control, and wherein lies the balance of God’s mercy and his justice? That, I do not know.

In the real, far less Lewis-inspired world, brass and clay do not come in either/or packages. The world we live in is full of both brass and clay, and most people have a fairly good balance of the two. Therefore, it does not do to dwell on whether we were dealt a fair proportion of brass to clay or clay to brass (depending on which we think we need). Instead, reasonable application of Lewis’s wisdom to our brass and clay inventory is to readily give both away: to stand at the foot of the cross, brass and clay laid before us, in a posture of ultimate repentance and humility. There, with full sincerity and supernatural, God-given faith, we say, “God, help me.” And there, God has already come down in Christ to take the brass and clay alike and to replace it with the fullness and righteousness of himself. Like the ghost, unclean and unworthy though we were, we make off towards the High Country, having been made completely new.

"For he has not despised or abhorred the affliction of the afflicted, and he has not hidden his face from him, but has heard, when he cried to him." -Psalm 22:24

Monday, September 11, 2017

A Grief Observed, Though Not Understood

Many of you who know me know that this semester I am taking perhaps the greatest class in the history of classes: a class devoted entirely to the thoughts and works of C.S. Lewis. Even if you do not know me but have happened upon this blog before, the evidence of C.S. Lewis’ impact on my life is probably evident in most thoughts I have and therefore most posts I write.

One of the themes we keep addressing in the class is the idea of human suffering: Why does it happen? What is God’s role in it? How should we respond to it? Lewis contemplates these questions a great deal in a deeply personal way in his book A Grief Observed, which we read and have been discussing in class. In response to the reading and discussion, my professor asked each of us in our class to write a short reflection in the form of a letter to a hypothetical person wrestling these questions.

I did not originally intend to share this reflection with anyone but my professor, but it has been in the back of my mind since I wrote it that, although I am by no means qualified to answer these questions either by wisdom or experience, I should still attempt it. We all should. In the town I left behind, there is a great deal of suffering going on. Many individuals are hurting, and because we love them, we hurt as a community. This hurt did not pass me by because I am not present. But I also realize this hurt is in no way limited to people I know and love. We all suffer. We all hurt. We all have unanswered and unanswerable questions. I cannot and will not pretend to have any more complete answers than you, my beloved readers, but I lay before you the fragments of answers I do have in the hope that maybe together, we can make some sense of them.


“To whom it may concern:

Please know first and foremost that I cannot and do not presume to know the depth or breadth or longevity or extremity of your pain; only that I can see you are experiencing pain and it saddens me beyond expression.

If you are like me, and I imagine you are at least in the sense which I am about to address, I know that in the midst of your suffering there lie many questions about why this has happened to you, and perhaps why it has happened at all. If you want answers, I am not the person to question, but I can say that I know deeply and personally the one you ought to question, and it is from his word and from others’ understanding of his character that I draw out these words for you now, which, though I know will not suffice in eliminating your doubts, I hope will at least cause those doubts to subside their crashing on your soul and sit still again. I find they are far more manageable in this state.

Our God is still good, and he still loves us. That is the beginning and the end--the only certainty I have in the midst of my own suffering and the only hope I can offer you in the midst of yours. How do I know with absolute certainty? I don’t. But any alternatives I can come up with are so improbable and so easily brought down that I can hardly consider them. I am as certain as one can possibly be. If God is good but does not love us, it does not matter to us that he is good: we are none of his concern. If God loves us but is not good, it does not matter to us that he loves us: love, like fire, is a tool when it is good and a weapon when it is bad. If God is not good and does not love us, neither matters: if this is the case, nothing matters at all.

In The Problem of Pain, C. S. Lewis spends a great deal of time discussing the goodness of God (and on that note, I recommend this book to you as Lewis is far wiser than I). One question I find myself asking frequently is, “If God loves me, why does he let me hurt so badly?” Similarly, when I see devastation around the world, and when I see people in pain who I know have fewer resources than I do to combat it, I ask, “If God loves at all, why does he allow this?” Lewis has the closest thing I know to an answer: “The problem of reconciling human suffering with the existence of a God who loves, is only insoluble so long as we attach a trivial meaning to the world ‘love,’ and look on things as if man were the centre of them. Man is not the centre.” I know this may not feel particularly comforting to consider at this time, but it is always worth considering: there are things, or at least a Thing, that is bigger and more significant than us. We believe that he loves us, and sometimes it is hard to reconcile the pain and suffering we experience with that belief, but in those instances I think it is not my God or my circumstances that should change, but rather my perception and expectations of both--not to say that my suffering is any less real or horrible or that my God is any less complicated, but that my suffering, though horrible, is necessary, and that my God, though complicated, is good.

Ultimately, there are true and false beliefs about God, but at the present time, there is no way to completely, beyond all doubts, separate the two. So for this time, the decision-maker is you. Weigh what you believe to be true against what others believe. Weigh it against what you can see. Weigh it against what you feel. Weigh it against all you think you know and realize how little you truly know, and strive not to know more, but to “misunderstand a little less completely.” In A Grief Observed, Lewis refers to his false hopes and understandings as a house of cards, which easily falls. When your house of cards falls, he suggests, don’t go to work immediately replacing it with new cards. Replace it with a solid foundation, that it may never fall again, and that even if it does fall again, you will not feel like you are reduced to nothing, as we do when we settle for anything less than a continually growing understanding.

The picture I want to leave you with is one found in the book of Lamentations: a broken man looking out over a broken world and taking in the vast, seemingly insurmountable suffering that small part of the world has seen. After spilling out a continuous stream of grief, the man experiences a moment of clarity: “For the Lord will not cast off forever, but, though he cause grief, he will have compassion according to the abundance of his steadfast love.” This too shall pass, and restoration is coming. How do I know with absolute certainty? I don’t. But if the pattern continues as it has throughout the history of man, I can trust without absolutes that our God will bring ultimate healing and restoration. I trust without absolutes that you will soon be able to do the same.”

“But this I call to mind, and therefore I have hope: The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases; his mercies never come to an end; they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.” -Lamentations 3:21-23